Difference between revisions of "What is an Object?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* [http://youstupidrelativist.com/02Sci/04Hypot/02Exhibit.html A hypothesis requires an object!] | * [http://youstupidrelativist.com/02Sci/04Hypot/02Exhibit.html A hypothesis requires an object!] | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|object]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|object]] |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | What is an Object? |
| Author(s) | Bill Gaede |
| Keywords | object, motion, Physics, volume, touch/see criterion, hypothesis |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 1 |
| No. of pages | 17 |
Abstract
Physics cannot be conducted without a proper definition of the word 'object'. Here I show that current misconceptions about this word, as well as about the scientific method, are the root of invalid hypotheses in Physics. Internet References:
